Legal Opinion
State v. Noriega
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 1984No. 5964PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
Defendant-appellant, Vivian Rhea Noriega, and codefendants, Charles Clemens and Jerry Wilkerson, were charged with burglary in the first degree in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1508, a class-2 felony. The defendant was also charged with aggravated assault in violation of A.R.S. § 13-1204(A)(2), a class-3 felony. For each of Noriega’s offenses the state filed punishment enhancement allegations of: the dangerousness of the offenses charged, A.R.S. § 13-604(G); prior felony convictions, A.R.S. § 13-604(B) and (D); and committing a nondangerous felony while on probation, parole, work…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- North Carolina v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CastanedaArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State of Iowa v. Anthony George BrothernSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- State v. CocioArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. AllieArizona Supreme Court · 1985
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.