Legal Opinion

State Board of Dispensing Opticians v. Schwab

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1963No. 6904PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

In February of 1957 appellee, Schwab, filed an application with the State Board of Dispensing Opticians for a license as a dispensing optician pursuant to A.R.S. § 32-1671 et seq. The application was denied-On appeal to the superior court the board’s decision was reversed, the court ordering the board to issue a license to Schwab as provided by law. This appeal by the board followed.

Schwab’s application was filed under a clause of the act commonly referred to as the “Grandfather” clause, § 32-1684, subd. B. “Grandfather” clauses are generally found where occupations not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Arizona Eastern Railroad v. MatthewsArizona Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Isley v. School District No. 2 of Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Arizona Corp. Commission v. Gem State Mut. Life Ass'nArizona Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Kilpatrick v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  2. State v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State v. McFallArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Police Pension Board of City of Phoenix v. WarrenArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API