Legal Opinion

Delp v. Zapp's Drug & Variety Stores

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1964PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

The plaintiff customer instituted an action for false imprisonment against the defendant Zapp’s Drug & Variety Stores, a storekeeper, and the defendant Wood, a private detective. Upon trial the court directed a verdict in favor of all the defendants.

Zapp’s is a self-service store. The plaintiff testified she came into Zapp’s carrying a large turkey and a half gallon of milk that she had purchased at a grocery store. She picked up a package of Bit, which apparently is a small package of dye. She believes she first carried this in her hand and later put it in the shallow pocket of the jacket…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Forster v. ManchesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Collyer v. S. H. Kress & Co.California Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Kuhnhausen v. StadelmanOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Lukas v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Pinkerton National Detective Agency, Inc. v. StevensCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Jacques v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. May Department Stores Company, Inc. v. DevercelliDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Gustafson v. Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Gortarez v. Smitty's Super Valu, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Lampos v. Bazar, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1974

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API