Legal Opinion
Worley v. Yarborough Ford, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 12, 1994No. 2278PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
This is a breach of contract action. The complaint alleges a breach of contract by the respondent, Yarborough Ford, Inc. (Yarborough), in its failure to return a $25,000 earnest money deposit to appellant, Leonard A. Worley. The trial court directed a verdict for Yarborough. Worley appeals. We affirm.
In February 1992, Worley and Yarborough entered into a contract whereby Worley agreed to buy Yarborough’s automobile dealership. At the contract’s signing, Worley paid Yarborough $25,000 earnest money. The agreement expressly provided that Yarborough had the option of retaining the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- C.A.N. Enterprises, Inc. v. South Carolina Health & Human Services Finance CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
- Strange v. S.C. Department of Highways & Public TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
- Murphy v. HaganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
- D. A. Davis Construction Co. v. Palmetto Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1984
- Ballenger Corp. v. City of Columbia, SCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- McGill v. MooreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- Lowcountry Open Land Trust v. Charleston Southern UniversityCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Parker v. ShecutCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- M & M GROUP, INC. v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
- Brewer v. Stokes Kia, Isuzu, Subaru, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.