Legal Opinion

Byrd v. Livingston

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided May 16, 2012No. 4973PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShort, J.

Forrest Byrd (Byrd) appeals from the trial court’s order finding an agreement to settle a lawsuit relating to a land purchase was enforceable. Byrd argues the court erred in: (1) finding his son was not a party to the agreement; (2) concluding the subsequent conduct of the parties and attorneys established the parties had a meeting of the minds on all terms of the agreement; (3) not applying the law of joint contracts to the motion to enforce the agreement; (4) finding the agreement did not contain a condition precedent; and (5) ruling the agreement’s provision that included his son was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Player v. ChandlerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1989
  3. Ecclesiastes Production Ministries v. Outparcel Associates, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  4. Pruitt v. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Joint Underwriting Ass'nSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  5. Pee Dee Stores, Inc. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Park Place Corp. v. Seaman Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2016
  2. Hughes v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  3. LM General Insurance Company v. FrederickDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  4. LM General Insurance Company v. FrederickDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
  5. Miller v. DillonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API