Legal Opinion

In Re Sappenfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1999No. 65577-4, 67380-2PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

980 P.2d 1271 (1999)

138 Wash.2d 588

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of Brandt E. SAPPENFIELD.

In the Matter of the Personal Restraint Petition of Brandt E. Sappenfield.

Nos. 65577-4, 67380-2.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

July 29, 1999.

Christine Gregoire, Attorney General, John Blonien, Thomas Young, Asst's Atty. Gen., Olympia, for Petitioner.

Eric Broman, Seattle, Brandt E. Sappenfield, Airway Heights, for Respondent.

IRELAND, J.

Sappenfield filed two separate personal restraint petitions (PRPs) in different divisions of the Court of Appeals. In both PRPs, Sappenfield…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. DavisonWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Duke v. BoydWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. HenningsWashington Supreme Court · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. State v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  3. In Re Personal Restraint Petition of SpiresCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. In Re SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API