Legal Opinion

Coleman v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 2007No. A07A0510PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Judge.

A jury found Randy Coleman guilty of aggravated sexual battery. On appeal, Coleman challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Coleman also contends that the trial court erred in admitting similar transaction evidence. Finding the evidence sufficient and no error in the admission of evidence, we affirm.

1. On appeal from a criminal conviction, the defendant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence, and we view the evidence in a light favorable to the verdict. We neither weigh the evidence nor determine witness credibility, but merely determine whether the evidence was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Duvall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Aaron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  4. McGhee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Enurah v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mcwilliams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2018
  2. Monroe v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  3. Alvarez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API