Legal Opinion

Enurah v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 16, 2006No. A06A0718PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ruffin, Chief Judge.

A jury found Anthony Enurah guilty of aggravated sexual battery. Enurah appeals, asserting that the trial court erred in denying his motion for directed verdict and in admitting certain evidence. Finding no error, we affirm.

1. “ ‘The standard of review for the denial of a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal is the same as for determining the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction.’ ” The evidence must be construed in a light favorable to the jury’s verdict, and we do not weigh the evidence or assess witness credibility.1 2 We merely determine whether…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. Hardeman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. De'Mon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Aaron v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Payne v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  2. Jenkins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2012
  3. Harmon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Breland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. Kelley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API