Legal Opinion

Goldstein v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 2006No. A06A1280PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Gary Goldstein guilty of child molestation and aggravated sexual battery. His amended motion for new trial was denied, and he now appeals, raising several enumerations of error. In addition to raising the general grounds, Goldstein contends that the trial court erred by clearing the courtroom for the victim’s testimony and that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Upon review, we find that the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to authorize the jury to find Goldstein guilty and that the trial court did not err in temporarily closing…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  5. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
  2. Hutchinson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  3. Douglas v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2017
  4. Darst v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Herrington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API