Duvall v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Phipps, Judge.
Keith Duvall appeals his child molestation conviction, contending that: (1) insufficient evidence supports his conviction; (2) the trial court should have granted a continuance based on the state’s alleged failure to produce the victim’s videotaped statement; and (3) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
1. “On appeal, the evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict and the appellant no longer enjoys the presumption of innocence; moreover, on appeal this court determines evidence sufficiency and does not…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Miller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- Goodwin v. Cruz-PadilloSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Lajara v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Ward v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Holsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Grant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Giddens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.