Legal Opinion

Mollhoff v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 6, 1905PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from the District Court of Caddo County/ before Franlc E. Gillette, Trial Judge

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J. :

The'plaintiff in error, George Moll-'hoff, brought this action in the district court of C'addo county to recover damages from the Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company for injuries received while in the employ of said company as a laborer. The cause was tried to a jury, and after both sides had introduced their evidence and rested, the court directed a verdict for the defendant.

The principal and controlling question in the cause is, whether the plaintiff’s injuries was the result of the negligence of the railway-company, or of one of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Ruemmeli-Braun Co. v. CahillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2008
  2. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. Kreps v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Barnsdall Oil Co. v. OhlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API