E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Co. v. Brooks
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Comanche County; J. T. Johnson, Judge. Action by James M. Brooks against the E. Van Winkle Gin & Machine Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This was an action to recover damages for personal injuries, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against the plaintiff in error, defendant below, prior to statehood. For convenience the parties hereafter will be called plaintiff and defendant, respectively. It seems that the defendant, a Georgia corporation, undertook to furnish the labor and material and to construct an oil mill at the city of Lawton; that in pursuance of said undertaking it employed the plaintiff to work on and about said oil mill as a common laborer; that at the time of the injury the plaintiff was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. CharlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Martin v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Sulsberger & Sons Co. v. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
- Kreps v. BradySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- E. Van Winkle Gin & MacHine Works v. BrooksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.