Legal Opinion

Ruemmeli-Braun Co. v. Cahill

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 3, 1904PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from the District Court of Logan County; before Jno. H. Burford, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by James W. Cahill was employed by the Reummeli-Braun Company in its ice plant as an oiler and wiper, and to do generally whatever he might be ordered to do by the chief engineer. While so employed he was directed to make a certain steam pipe connection in the engine room, at a point some sixteen feet above the floor, and for this purpose he got a ladder, and he and the chief engineer placed it in position. He ascended the ladder and began making the connection. After he had worked a short time, he says the ladder slipped a little, and the chief engineer, who was standing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Northern Pacific Railroad v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HamblySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. New England Railroad v. ConroySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Central Railroad Company v. KeeganSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Prickett v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Chickasaw Compress Co. v. BowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Cosden Pipe Line Co. v. BerrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  4. Beasley v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. Big Jack Mining Co. v. ParkinsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API