Legal Opinion

Pugh v. Turner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1946No. A-991PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sharp

Mary Virginia Scott Turner instituted this suit, individually and as independent executrix of the will of her then husband, J. H. Scott, to recover on two negotiable promissory notes, aggregating $8,832.00, plus interest and other charges. Such notes were executed by petitioner, T. O. Pugh, to J. H. Scott, and at the time of their execution they were secured by a mortgage on Pugh’s farm machinery and wheat crop. Pugh defended the suit, on the contention that, at Scott’s suggestion, it was agreed between them that if Pugh would sell his machinery and bring the proceeds to Scott, together with…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Newton v. NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Oury v. SaundersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Mitchell v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Stiles v. HawkinsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1918
  5. Spencer v. SchellTexas Supreme Court · 1915

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. In Re PuigTexas Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Chandler v. WelbornTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Interfirst Bank-Houston, N.A. v. Quintana Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  4. Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Diamond Paint Company of Houston v. EmbryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API