Legal Opinion

Diamond Paint Company of Houston v. Embry

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 18, 1975No. 1069PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTISS BROWN, Justice.

This case originated in a loan transaction. W. D. “Don” Shepherd (Shepherd) was active in many business and promotional activities including a number of corporations containing the word “Diamond” in their name. He was a major stockholder and dominated the activities of these companies which were often managed with very little regard for corporate formalities. Diamond Paint Company (Paint) was a viable and somewhat successful company. Shepherd organized Diamond Industries (Industries) for the purpose of holding stock in other “Diamond” companies including Paint. At the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Cartwright v. CanodeTexas Supreme Court · 1914
  3. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  4. Cooper Petroleum Co. v. LaGloria Oil and Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Ballard v. CarmichaelTexas Supreme Court · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Zieben v. PlattCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  2. Clark v. Dedina, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  3. Ginsberg 1985 Real Estate Partnership v. Cadle Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. Toonen v. United Services Automobile Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
  5. Texas First National Bank v. Ng, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2005

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API