Legal Opinion

Stiles v. Hawkins

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1918No. 14-2591PublishedCited by 68 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Third Supreme Judicial District. Action by Sam Stiles and others against B. F. Hawkins and others. A judgment foh plaintiffs was reversed by the Court of Civil Appeals (158 S. W. 1011), and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, J.

Plaintiffs in error brought this suit in trespass to try title against defendants in error to recover a one-half undivided interest in two surveys in Ellis county of 160 acres each, and for partition. The main question for our determination is whether the land involved was the separate property of George Stiles or the community property of George and Zilpah Stiles. Defendants in error are devisees under the will of Zilpah Stiles, and plaintiffs in error are the heirs at law of George Stiles.

The land sued for was a part of the Mississippi & Pacific Railroad reserve. It was surveyed on April 2,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Newton v. NewtonTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Oriental Hotel Company v. GriffithsTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Welder v. LambertTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Creamer v. BriscoeTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Yates v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1848

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Bruni v. VidaurriTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Todd v. BrunerTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Smith v. BussTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Interfirst Bank-Houston, N.A. v. Quintana Petroleum Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  5. Elliott v. NelsonTexas Supreme Court · 1923

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API