Legal Opinion

Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church v. Tower Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 2003No. 01-1201PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. Patrick Crooks, J.

¶ 1. This case involves an insurance action where, as a result of mistake, the insurance policy failed to provide hired and non-owned automobile coverage that the insured requested. After Tower Insurance Company (Tower) learned of the mis*339take, it failed in its duty to its insured, Trinity Evangelical Lutheran Church and School-Freistadt (Trinity) to investigate properly and evaluate reasonably. It initially refused to backdate coverage when the error was discovered after an accident occurred. The pivotal dispute in this case centers on what Tower should have done once it became aware of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Simon v. San Paolo US Holding Co., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Strenke v. HognerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Brown v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API