Legal Opinion

Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. Acuity

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 5, 2009No. 24892, 24904PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JENSEN, Circuit Judge.

[¶ 1.] Dakota, Minnesota and Eastern Railroad (DM & E) filed this action claiming that Acuity, f/k/a Heritage Mutual Insurance Co. (Acuity), engaged in bad faith and vexatious failure to pay uninsured motorist (UM) benefits. DM & E appeals the circuit court’s entry of summary judgment on the claims. Acuity cross-appeals the circuit court’s discovery orders compelling Acuity’s attorneys to give a deposition in the case.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

[¶ 2.] On July 28, 1998, DM & E employee Julian Olson (Olson) was seriously injured in a motor vehicle accident while acting in the scope…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  3. National Sav. Life Ins. Co. v. DuttonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Zilisch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dolan v. Aid Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1988

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Bertelsen v. Allstate Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Andrews v. Ridco & Twin City Fire Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Harvieux v. Progressive N. Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Zochert v. Protective Life Ins. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2018

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API