Legal Opinion

Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANK

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2006No. 2003AP2108PublishedCited by 100 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPatience Drake Roggensack, J.

¶ 1. We review a court of appeals decision that affirmed the circuit court's grant of summary judgment dismissing the claims of Hoida, Inc. (Hoida) against defendants M&I Midstate Bank (M&I) and McDonald Title Company, Inc. (McDonald Title). Hoida is a subcontractor that incurred losses on a building project gone awry when the general contractor and the owner of the property fraudulently misappropriated approximately $650,000 of the project's construction loan proceeds. M&I and McDonald Title were the lending bank and the disbursing agent, respectively, on the project. Hoida claimed that it…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Palsgraf v. Long Island R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Coffey v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Ollerman v. O'Rourke Co., Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Morgan v. Pennsylvania General InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Connor v. Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by100 opinions

  1. Katherine Lees v. Carthage CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Behrendt v. Gulf Underwriters InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Krier v. VilioneWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Oneida County Department of Social Services v. Nicole W.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Estate of Genrich v. OHIC Ins. Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009

95 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API