Legal Opinion
Ross v. Jacobs
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1984No. 59770PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STUBBLEFIELD, Judge.
This is a medical malpractice/manufacturers’ products liability case involving the question of the adequacy of the warning given to the physician and consumer regarding possible adverse effects of the prescription drug Myambutol. The defendant manufacturer moved for summary judgment, requesting the court to rule that its duty to warn was discharged by the warning of possible side effects given to plaintiff’s physician. The trial court agreed and granted summary judgment. We reverse and remand.
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On August 13, 1979, while plaintiff, John R. Ross, was under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seley v. G. D. Searle & Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
- Stuckey v. Young Exploration Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Irene M. YarrowCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thom v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Knowles v. Tripledee Drilling Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
- Hoffman-Rattet v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1987
- Percival v. American Cyanamid Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1987
- James v. Coloplast Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.