Percival v. American Cyanamid Co.
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Before the Court are two motions for partial summary judgment filed October 27, 1987, by defendant American Cyanamid Company, d/b/a Lederle Laboratories (hereinafter “Lederle”). The first motion concerns the learned intermediary and sophisticated user rules; the second motion concerns the adequacy of Lederle’s warnings. Plaintiffs responded in opposition to both motions on November 16, 1987, and both parties presented oral argument to the Court on November 23, 1987. 1
The facts presented to the Court upon a Motion for Summary Judgment must be construed in a light…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Board of Ed., Island Trees Union Free School Dist. No. 26 v. PicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Kirkland v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
- Richard D. Ellis v. El Paso Natural Gas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mazur v. Merck & Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- McDowell v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Myers Ex Rel. Myers v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997