Legal Opinion

Lakata v. DiSandro

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 29, 1954No. Appeals, 26 and 27PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Hirt, J.,

The defendant had excavated a trench along the west side of Burholme Avenue running northwardly 400 feet from Stanwood Street to Solly Avenue in the City of Philadelphia under a contract with the city for the construction of a sewer. Solly and Burholme Avenues come together in an inverted L intersection. Plaintiffs lived on the east side of Burholme Avenue some distance south of Solly Avenue. The wife-plaintiff’s mother lived on the west side of Burholme Avenue diagonally across from her daughter’s home. About 8 p.m. on October 26, 1949, this plaintiff, intending to go to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Barth Et Vir v. KlinckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. Schaut v. St. Marys' BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Keiser v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  5. Musselman v. Hatfield BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Diakolios v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Smith v. Sheraden BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Diakolios v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API