Lakata v. DiSandro
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
The defendant had excavated a trench along the west side of Burholme Avenue running northwardly 400 feet from Stanwood Street to Solly Avenue in the City of Philadelphia under a contract with the city for the construction of a sewer. Solly and Burholme Avenues come together in an inverted L intersection. Plaintiffs lived on the east side of Burholme Avenue some distance south of Solly Avenue. The wife-plaintiff’s mother lived on the west side of Burholme Avenue diagonally across from her daughter’s home. About 8 p.m. on October 26, 1949, this plaintiff, intending to go to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dively v. Penn-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Barth Et Vir v. KlinckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Schaut v. St. Marys' BoroughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Keiser v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Musselman v. Hatfield BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Diakolios v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Smith v. Sheraden BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Diakolios v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956