Legal Opinion
Schaut v. St. Marys' Borough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 1940No. Appeals, 31 and 32PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hibt, J.,
In this action in trespass brought by plaintiff against the Borough of St. Marys, for personal injuries, The St. Marys Trust Company, as trustee, was brought in on scire facias as an additional defendant. The trial resulted in a verdict for $1,000 for plaintiff against the borough and for the borough over, against the additional defendant. (Baxter v. Homestead Boro., 120 Pa. Superior Ct. 182, 182 A. 68). Defendants’ negligence and plaintiff’s contributory negligence are the questions involved.
Before midnight on December 24, 1936, plaintiff was walking westwardly on the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Whitton v. H. A. Gable Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Pennsylvania Mutual Life Ins. v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Rugart v. Keebler-Weyl Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
- Coolbroth v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
- Bruggeman v. City of YorkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marshall v. City of CentraliaIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
- Williams v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
- Baisley v. Missisquoi Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- Splinter v. City of NampaIdaho Supreme Court · 1950
- Bromberg v. GekoskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.