Diakolios v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Arnold,
This is an action of trespass for injuries suffered by wife-plaintiff in a fall in defendant’s store while a business visitor therein. The jury returned a verdict for plaintiffs, but on defendant’s motion the court below entered judgment for defendant n.o.v. Plaintiffs appeal.
The verdict having been for plaintiffs, it is the well established rule that the testimony and all its inferences must be viewed in a light most favorable to them. The court below recognized this rule, but improperly concluded that plaintiffs failed to establish defendant’s negligence as the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jerominski v. Fowler, Dick & WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Holbert v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
- Mars v. Meadville Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- Johnson v. RulonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Vereb v. MarkowitzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Majors v. Brodhead HotelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Kravinsky v. GloverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Dorsey v. Yoder CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1971
- Little v. York County Earned Income Tax BureauSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.