Legal Opinion

Smith v. Sheraden Bank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ross, J.,

Appellants, husband and wife, brought this action in trespass for damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife as the; result of a fall on the sidewalk abutting defendant bank’s premises in the City of Pittsburgh. After the jury returned verdicts in favor of the plaintiffs the court below entered judgment n.o.v. on the ground that the wife-plaintiff was contributorily negligent, and the plaintiffs have taken this appeal.

On the .morning of June 8, 1950 the wife-plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as plaintiff) was walking from her home to a street car stop at the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. MacDonald v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Pascarella v. KelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Harrison Et Vir. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  4. Davis v. PotterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Tauber v. WilkinsburgSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Haven Borough v. BoltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  2. Stewart v. ScharffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. Mohar, L. v. Shawver, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API