Legal Opinion

Toledo Bar Assn. v. Weisberg

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2010No. 2008-0390PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Joseph D. Weisberg of Sylvania, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0001441, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1967. On March 26, 2007, we suspended respondent’s license to practice for an interim period pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(5)(A)(4) upon receiving notice that he had been convicted of a felony. See In re Weisberg, 113 Ohio St.3d 1424, 2007-Ohio-1313, 863 N.E.2d 642.

{¶ 2} The Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline recommends that as our final disposition in this case we suspend respondent’s license to practice for two years. Because he has been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Erie-Huron Counties Joint Certified Grievance Committee v. MilesOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. VogtsbergerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. RoetzelOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. RiekOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. GildeeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. FuscoOhio Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Dayton Bar Assn. v. MatlockOhio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API