Legal Opinion

Dayton Bar Assn. v. Matlock

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2012No. 2012-1023Published

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Michael Duane Matlock of Dayton, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0008564, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1985. We have previously suspended Matlock from the practice of law in Ohio for failing to comply with the continuing legal education (“CLE”) requirements of Gov.Bar R. X. See In re Report of Comm, on Continuing Legal Edn., 88 Ohio St.3d 1468, 726 N.E.2d 1006 (2000). We have also suspended Matlock from the practice of law in Ohio on four separate occasions for failing to file a certificate of registration and pay applicable fees in accordance with Gov.Bar…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Angelo Benedetti, Inc. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. CrosbyOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. RiekOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Toledo Bar Assn. v. WeisbergOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Akron Bar Assn. v. McNerneyOhio Supreme Court · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API