Legal Opinion
Ingram v. Newman
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided August 27, 2003PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
JUDGE SIMPSON.
Petitioner Clair A. Ingram (Ingram), an inmate at a state correctional institution, filed a petition for review in this Court’s original jurisdiction asserting that Carol A. Newman (Newman), Prothonotary and Clerk of Courts of Blair County, and Jeffrey Beard (Beard), Secretary of the Pennsylvania Department of Corrections (DOC) (collectively, Respondents), improperly deducted funds from his inmate account pursuant to Section 9728 of the Sentencing Code, 42 Pa.C.S. § 9728, commonly known as Act 84, 1 to pay sentenced costs, fines, and restitution.
Ingram filed a motion…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. HallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Profit Wize Marketing v. WiestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Harding v. StickmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Gmerek v. State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- George v. BeardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bundy, K., Aplt v. WetzelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. ParellaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- A. Johnson v. J. Wetzel, Secretary PA. D.O.C.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Com. v. Richter, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.