Legal Opinion

Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 20, 2006PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

Before this Court in our original jurisdiction are the preliminary objections of the Pennsylvania Game Commission (Game Commission), the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (DCNR) and certain Commonwealth officers 1 (collectively, Respondents) to a ComplainVRequest for Writ of Mandamus filed by the Unified Sportsmen of Pennsylvania and its members (Sportsmen). The Complaint seeks an order directing Respondents to provide the data and information on which the Game Commission relies in setting “harvest” 2 figures for Pennsylvania’s deer…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. R.W. v. ManzekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Robinson Township v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Unified Sportsmen v. Pennsylvania Game CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. A. Funk O. Harrison, a minor, by his guardian A. Lee v. Tom Wolf, in his official capacity as Governor of Pennsylvania PA DEPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Malt Beverages Distribution Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. DeBlasio v. PignoliCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API