Legal Opinion

Profit Wize Marketing v. Wiest

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 2002PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY JOYCE, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant, Michael Wiest, appeals from the November 30, 2001 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County directing him to pay $14,979.63 in attorney fees and costs to Appellee, Profit Wize Marketing t/a Executrain of Allentown & Harrisburg (“Executrain”). Upon review, we reverse. The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows.

¶ 2 On February 1, 2000, Appellant, a sales representative, entered into an employment contract with Executrain, a company providing computer-training services to customers throughout Pennsylvania. This contract not only…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern SectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Dennis v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  5. Meeting House Lane, Ltd. v. MelsoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  4. Eastern Electric Corp. v. Shoemaker Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. DiGregorio v. Keystone Health Plan EastSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API