Profit Wize Marketing v. Wiest
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY JOYCE, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant, Michael Wiest, appeals from the November 30, 2001 order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County directing him to pay $14,979.63 in attorney fees and costs to Appellee, Profit Wize Marketing t/a Executrain of Allentown & Harrisburg (“Executrain”). Upon review, we reverse. The relevant facts and procedural history are as follows.
¶ 2 On February 1, 2000, Appellant, a sales representative, entered into an employment contract with Executrain, a company providing computer-training services to customers throughout Pennsylvania. This contract not only…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hoy v. AngeloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Victor Barrios v. California Interscholastic Federation California Interscholastic Federation Opinion Southern SectionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Dennis v. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Meeting House Lane, Ltd. v. MelsoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- McMullen v. KutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Ge Betz, Inc. v. ConradCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Eastern Electric Corp. v. Shoemaker Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- DiGregorio v. Keystone Health Plan EastSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.