Legal Opinion
Heaton v. Nelson
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided November 8, 1920No. 9763PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Action on promissory notes. Judgment for defendant. Error to the County Court of Pueblo County, Hon. Frank G. Mirick, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
This was an action before justice of the peace on three promissory notes for $50 each, appealed to the county court of Pueblo county, where defendant had judgment on the notes and for $100 on a counterclaim. Plaintiff brings error.
The plaintiff and defendant had entered into the following contract and the notes in suit were those referred to therein:
*321“Pueblo, Colorado, January 24, 1917. Beceived of Henry Nelson the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), as payment on my house and lots at Turret, Chaffee County, Colorado, to be known as lots 7 and 8 in the said town of Turret. I hereby agree to…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lowe v. HarwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
- Price v. ImmelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
- Smith v. LambIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
- Bennett v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1867
- Heaton v. MyersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1878
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Fern v. CrandellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Mitchell v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1962
- Gillett v. CheairsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Stewart Livestock Co. v. OstlerUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Pacific Enterprises Oil Company, a California Corporation v. Charles S. HertzCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.