Legal Opinion

Fern v. Crandell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 3, 1926No. 11,239PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Crandell brought suit against Fern to cancel a lease given by Fern to one Smith and assigned to plaintiff, and to recover $500 paid thereon, on the ground of failure of title. The findings were general for the plaintiff who had judgment for the $500, but the lease was not expressly cancelled. Fern brings error.

The recovery of the $500 should be affirmed and probably that in effect cancels the lease, but we think it should have been expressly cancelled.

Assuming, as we must, that all material matters in dispute, which were few and unimportant, were found for the plaintiff, the facts are as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wells v. Schuster-Hax National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1897
  2. Wolf v. BurkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  3. Polk v. ButterfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  4. Brown v. Gordon-Tiger Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. v. BettsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Camalier & Buckley-Madison, Inc. v. The Madison Hotel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
  2. United States National Bank v. BartgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Smith v. Kent Oil Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Shanahan v. CollinsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1975
  5. Geller v. McCowanNevada Supreme Court · 1947

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API