Legal Opinion

Gillett v. Cheairs

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 8, 1926No. 11,463PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison

Sallie J. Cheairs brought suit against E. M. Gillett on a promissory note for $4,000. Her demurrer to the amended answer and cross-complaint was sustained; he stood by his pleading; judgment went against him and he brings error.

The answer shows that on April 25, 1919, the plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract as follows: “At- tides of Agreement * * * between Sallie J. Cheairs * * * of the first part and E. M. Grillett of the second part:

“ Witness eth, That if the party of the second part shall first make the payments and perform the covenants hereinafter mentioned on his part to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loud v. Pomona Land & Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Chicago Deposit Vault Co. v. McNultaSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Michigan Home Colony Co. v. TaborCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. Heaton v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920
  5. Allison v. SchuberSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Converse v. ZinkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. White v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Little Horn State Bank v. GrossMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Potter v. ConnorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Ideal Family & Youth Ranch v. WhetstineColorado Court of Appeals · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API