Legal Opinion

Price v. Immel

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 15, 1910No. 6303PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Kit Carson District Court — Hon. J. W. Sheafor, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabbert

Appellant, as plaintiff, brought suit against the appellees, as defendants, to cancel a contract to sell certain real estate which he had entered into with the defendant Immel. The defendant Winegar, as assignee of the contract, filed a cross-complaint, asking for its specific performance. The judgment was in favor of Winegar, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The stenographer’s notes taken at the' trial were lost; consequently, counsel for plaintiff has not been able to present all the testimony, but contends that from the record proper, the pleadings, the exhibits introduced in evidence, and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Maryland Construction Co. v. KuperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
  2. French v. WoodruffSupreme Court of Colorado · 1898
  3. Mulock v. WilsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
  4. Nix v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1899
  5. Powell v. ConantMichigan Supreme Court · 1876

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Palm Beach Estates v. CrokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  2. Amoss v. BennionUtah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Tremonton Inv. Co. v. HorneUtah Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Friedman v. Colorado National Bank of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Hitchens v. Milner Land, Coal & Townsite Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1919

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API