Legal Opinion

De Los Santos v. Occidental Chemical Corp.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1996No. 96-0428PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Per curiam

“A person may appeal from an interlocutory order ... that ... certifies or refuses to certify a class in a suit brought under Rule 42 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure_” Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem.Code § 51.014(3). The single issue before us is whether the order appealed from falls within this provision. The court of appeals held that it did not and dismissed the appeal for want of jurisdiction. 925 S.W.2d 62. We have jurisdiction to determine whether the court of appeals correctly decided its jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal. Del Valle Ind. School Dist. v. Lopez, 845 S.W.2d 808, 809…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. General Motors Corp. v. BloyedTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Del Valle Independent School District v. LopezTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Long v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Pierce Mortuary Colleges, Inc. v. Bjerke, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
  5. De Los Santos v. Occidental Chemical Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bally Total Fitness Corp. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. the City of Houston v. the Estate of Kenneth Samuel JonesTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Rio Grande Valley Gas Co. v. City of Pharr, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
  4. In the Interest of M.M.O.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  5. National Western Life Insurance Co. v. Rowe, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API