In the Interest of M.M.O.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
RICKHOFF, Justice.
This case arises from the failure of the attorney general’s office to collect accrued interest on delinquent child support in thousands of child-support enforcement actions it *76has filed. Two child-support obligees sought to redress this failure by way of a class action. The case followed a procedurally unusual course, ultimately resulting in an order certifying two types of claims as a class action: 1) claims involving setting aside or modifying prior enforcement orders, and 2) a claim for a declaratory judgment regarding the Attorney General’s obligation to collect' accrued…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- United States Parole Commission v. GeraghtySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- South Carolina v. KatzenbachSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- General Motors Corp. v. BloyedTexas Supreme Court · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- The MD Anderson Cancer Center v. NovakTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- in the Estate of Rosa Elvia GuerreroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
- Monsanto Co. v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Galley v. Apollo Associated Services, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2005
- Met-Rx USA, Inc. v. Shipman, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.