Legal Opinion
Ammex, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Michael A. Cox, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided December 3, 2003No. 01-2392, 01-2518PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROGERS, Circuit Judge.
The Attorney General of Michigan issued a Notice of Intended Action (“NIA”) to Ammex, Inc. informing it that its advertising might result in the Attorney General filing an enforcement action under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”). In response, Ammex sought a declaratory judgment against the Attorney General, asserting that the Attorney General could not enforce the MCPA against it because (1) federal law preempted the MCPA with respect to Ammex, and (2) any enforcement of the MCPA against Ammex would abrogate the restrictions placed upon states by the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- County of Los Angeles v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- America Cargo Transport, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Henry Hill v. Rick SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Warshak v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- League of Women Voters of Ohio v. BrunnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.