Legal Opinion

United States v. The Hanover Insurance Co., Defendant/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 1, 1996No. 95-1192, 95-1215PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge MAYER. Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge BRYSON.

*1053MAYER, Circuit Judge.

The United States appeals from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding that the United States Customs Service may not enforce a time-barred claim for antidumping duties by resort to administrative procedures. United States v. Hanover Ins. Co., 869 F.Supp. 950 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1994). We affirm.

Background

The facts are not in dispute. On November 10, 1992, the United States commenced an action against Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), surety…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. S.E.R., Jobs for Progress, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
  2. United States v. Hanover InsuranceUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Ammex, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  2. Amoco Prodn Co v. Watson, Rebecca W.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  3. OXY USA, Inc. v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Former Employees of BMC Software, Inc. v. United States Secretary of LaborUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  5. Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API