Legal Opinion
Hren v. Detroit Edison
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1996No. 102853, COA No. 170599PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
547 N.W.2d 663 (1996)
Leroy HREN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DETROIT EDISON, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 102853, COA No. 170599.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
February 2, 1996.
ORDER
On order of the Court, the delayed application for leave to appeal is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
LEVIN, J., states as follows:
I would grant leave to appeal.
I
LeRoy Hren left a bar in Inkster and was crossing the road with a companion. He was wearing dark clothes, and the street lights were not working. As he started across the street, his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- H. R. Moch Co. v. Rensselaer Water Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Weinberg v. DingerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Doyle v. South Pittsburgh Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Harris v. Board of Water and Sewer Com'rs of City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Potter v. Carolina Water CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Simkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Horneyer v. City of SpringfieldMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
- Dean v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Dean v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996
- Simkins v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1996