Legal Opinion

Dean v. Department of Corrections

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1996No. 101956. Calendar No. 14PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBoyle, J.

i

We granted leave in this case to determine whether disciplinary credits or other forms of sentence-credit reductions can be applied against a minimum term of imprisonment that has been imposed pursuant to the downward departure provisions of MCL 333.7401(4); MSA 14.15(7401)(4) and MCL 333.7403(3); MSA 14.15(7403)(3).

Plaintiff contends that a departure from a minimum sentence pursuant to subsection 7401(4) or subsection 7403(3) necessarily means that a defendant is no longer “subject to a mandatory term of imprisonment” pursuant to subsection 7401(3) and so is eligible to receive disciplinary…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Longstreth v. GenselMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. FieldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. People v. MorrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Victorson v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hren v. Detroit EdisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stajos v. City of LansingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Dean v. Department of CorrectionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API