Legal Opinion
Sandlass v. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 21, 2006No. Civil Action RDB-06-771PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BENNETT, District Judge.
This action arises from a Complaint filed by Plaintiff Richard Sandlass (“Sandlass” or “Plaintiff’) against Defendant Sears, Roebuck and Co. (“Sears” or “Defendant”). Plaintiff alleges that he was wrongfully discharged in retaliation for filing a workmen’s compensation claim after he was injured in the workplace. Plaintiff originally filed his Complaint in the Circuit Court for Harford County, Maryland, but Defendant removed the case to this Court based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Currently pending before this Court is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc. v. HensonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Matthew Dixon v. Coburg Dairy, Incorporated, Equal Employment Advisory Council, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Sherrod v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hackworth v. Guyan Heavy Equipment, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Shaw v. Ring Power Corp.District Court, N.D. Florida · 2013
- Belyea v. FloridaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2012
- STEWART v. LEWISDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2019