First Nat. Bank in Mobile v. Watters
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The power of a court of equity, in a proper case, to hasten the enjoyment of a trust fund, by awarding advancements to tbe beneficiary before the time fixed by the creator of the trust, is generally recognized. Pearce v. Pearce, 199 Ala. 491, 74 So. 952; Shelton v. King, 229 U. S. 90, 33 S. Ct. 686, 57 L. Ed. 1086; Blackburn v. Hawkins, 6 Ark. 50; Wardens & Vestry of St. Paul’s Church v. Attorney General and Others, 164 Mass. 188, 41 N. E. 231; Knorr v. Millard, 52Mich. 542, 18 N. W. 349; Mills v. Michigan Trust Co., 124 Mich. 244, 82 N. W. 1046; Tompkins v. Tompkins’ Executors, 18 N. J. Eq.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Shelton v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Wardens & Vestry of St. Paul's Church v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
- Pennington v. Metropolitan Museum of ArtNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
- Knorr v. MillardMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Watters v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
- In re Gregory's Will, Circuit Court of the 15th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Palm Beach County1954