Watters v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Justice.
That “the best laid schemes o’mice and men gang aft a-3'ley” is well illustrated by the will of Julian A. Watters, Sr., here presented for judicial interpretation, and involving the final disposition of an estate. of approximately three-quarters of a million dollars.
The will’s uniqueness lies in the apparent confident anticipation of a happy family of both boys and girls, with some detail of differing provisions for each separate class, though at the time of its execution in April, 1913, the testator had a wife and only child, a son 5 years of age. But the testatot died…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- McCartney v. OsburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
- Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Duncan v. De YampertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- Gunter v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- George v. WidemireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Wright v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
- Perdue v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Austin v. PeppermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.