Legal Opinion

Watters v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1936No. 1 Div. 908PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Justice.

That “the best laid schemes o’mice and men gang aft a-3'ley” is well illustrated by the will of Julian A. Watters, Sr., here presented for judicial interpretation, and involving the final disposition of an estate. of approximately three-quarters of a million dollars.

The will’s uniqueness lies in the apparent confident anticipation of a happy family of both boys and girls, with some detail of differing provisions for each separate class, though at the time of its execution in April, 1913, the testator had a wife and only child, a son 5 years of age. But the testatot died…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  2. McCartney v. OsburnIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Henderson v. HendersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  4. Duncan v. De YampertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Gunter v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. George v. WidemireSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  2. Wright v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  3. Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Perdue v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  5. Austin v. PeppermanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API