Legal Opinion
Frazer v. First Nat. Bank of Mobile
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 20, 1938No. 1 Div. 973PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TITOMAS, Justice.
The appeal is from a decree upon exceptions to the report of the register.
The assignments of error present questions for decision to the effect that the decree is infected with error (1) in sustaining the exceptions filed by the First National Bank of Mobile as a trustee to the report- of the register allowing $48,376.72 for fees and compensation to the solicitors of record for joint services 'rendered to the minor Julian A. Watters, III, in the instant cause; (2) in overruling the exceptions to the report filed by the register of the solicitors for Julian A. Watters, III,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- STANTON v. Embrey, AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Broadway National Bank v. AdamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. CrosbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
- Pearce v. PearceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Robinson v. CrotwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Peebles v. MileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Graddick v. First Farmers & Merchants Nat.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- King v. KeithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- ARMY AVIATION CTR. FED. CREDIT U. v. PostonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Beal Bank, SSB v. SchilleciSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.