Legal Opinion

Pennington v. Metropolitan Museum of Art

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided July 14, 1903PublishedCited by 31 opinions

On bill for relief respecting the trust arising under the will and codicils of Jacob S. Rogers, deceased, and for instructions and directions to the trustees thereof. The following extracts from said will and codeils show the trust in question: WiLL OF JACOB S. ROGERS. “Sixteenth.

Read the full summary

On bill for relief respecting the trust arising under the will and codicils of Jacob S. Rogers, deceased, and for instructions and directions to the trustees thereof. The following extracts from said will and codeils show the trust in question: WiLL OF JACOB S. ROGERS. “Sixteenth. All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate real and personal of every nature and kind and wherever situate, I give, devise and bequeath to my brother Columbus B. Rogers and my friend Asabel S. Levy my Executors hereinafter named and appointed. To have and to hoicl unto them their successors and assigns…

1Opinion of the Court

Mague, Chancellor.

Complainants are the executors of Jacob S. Eogers, deceased, and hold, as trustees, the personal and real property withdrawn and excluded from the residuary disposition made by the sixteenth clause of the will of the testator, and created a trust fund by the provisions of the second clause of the first codicil to said will. Their bill seeks specific relief respecting the disposition and management of the trust fund, and it contains a prayer for general relief.

The defendants are the Metropolitan Museum of Art, a corporation of the city of New York; Theodore B. Eogers, Jr.;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curtiss v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Gavin v. CurtinIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Voris v. SloanIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Johns v. JohnsIllinois Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Richards v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Davison v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  3. TRUSTEES OF RUTGERS COLLEGE IN NJ v. RichmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Adams v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Burgess v. NailCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API