General Electric Company, a Corporation v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
2Per curiam
The defendant has filed a motion for reconsideration raising several points, only one of which merits some further discussion. That argument is that our decision ignores certain Defense Department (and other government) directives said to implement the Anti-Deficiency Act, 31 U.S.C. § 665, and thus to deprive the contracting officer (Lt. Col. McDermott) of all authority to approve the over-run. We do not at all consider this point on its merits, in this case, because it comes far too late in the litigation. These directives —which defendant says, and…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Louis G. Ruderer v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- American Potash & Chemical Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- American Potash & Chemical Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- John A. Henneberger v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
4Cited by45 opinions
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Mega Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Aerolease Long Beach v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Seldovia Native Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.