Legal Opinion

John A. Henneberger v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 14, 1969No. 71-67PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR REHEARING

SKELTON, Judge.

The plaintiff’s motion for rehearing is denied for the following reasons:

1. The plaintiff is estopped from claiming after judgment has been entered that a part of Navy Regulation 044189-1, cited in our opinion, was not in force when his claim arose, because he represented to the court that he based his claim upon such regulation by:

a. Specifically and affirmatively pleading it in paragraph V of his original petition.

b. Quoting it as the law involved on page 3 of his brief in support of his mo tion for summary judgment, and arguing on pages 7…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. General Electric Company, a Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Peters v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Buchanan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. Weir v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  5. Ernest Samuel Nossen and E. S. Nossen Laboratories, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API