Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Cheeseman

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 15, 1930No. 6 Div. 395PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBourdin, J.

The bill was filed to enjoin the erection of a filling station in an alleged restricted residence district. The equity of the bill rests on alleged covenants running with the land restricting the area to high-class residential purposes.

In 1925 Hollywood Rand Company surveyed and platted a subdivision known as Hollywood. It put to record the duly certified plat showing the layout of winding streets, designated “Drives,” “avenues,” and one “Boulevard,” and showing lots of varied size and form, numbered serially from 1 to 96, with a few lettered lots, making, in the aggregate, some 103 lots.

Exten…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Scheuer v. BrittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laney v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Carter v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  3. Fletcher v. BarnardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  4. Milton v. MaplesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  5. Associates Discount Corp. v. Big Three Dodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API