Legal Opinion

Royal Globe Insurance Co. v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 11, 1973No. 1 CA-IC 816PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DONOFRIO, Presiding Judge.

This appeal is before us on a writ of certiorari to review the lawfulness of findings and award by The Industrial Commission of Arizona determining that a heart attack (acute myocardial infarction) suffered by respondent Efriam G. Haro (Haro) arose out of his employment, thus awarding him medical, surgical and hospital benefits.

On August 30, 1971, Haro suffered a heart attack while on the job for M. J. Lang Construction Company. At the time of his injury his job responsibility was to operate a “tamper”, a machine which weighs approximately 100 pounds and with…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Malinski v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Russell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Rowe v. Goldberg Film Delivery Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hemphill v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Reed v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holding v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. State Compensation Fund v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
  3. Kleinsmith v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  4. T.W.M. Custom Framing v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  5. Hunter v. Industrial Commission of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API