Legal Opinion

Southern California Telephone Co. v. County of Los Angeles

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 1941No. Civ. 6249; Civ. 6250PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTuttle, J.

These actions were filed separately, but consolidated for trial and on appeal. In one, plaintiff seeks to recover the sum of $398,756.91, which amount was paid to the City of Los Angeles as taxes under an assessment levied by the State Board of Equalization. In the second, plaintiff seeks to recover, under a similar action, the sum of $909,-039.49 against the County of Los Angeles. At the close of plaintiff’s case, and in each action, the trial court granted" a nonsuit. The appeals are taken from judgments of dismissal thereafter entered.

The complaints in each case, so far as the statement of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Louisville & N. R.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  2. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. CheyenneSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Riley v. MartinelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Columbus Southern Railway Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. De Luz Homes, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. County of Sacramento v. HickmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. ITT World Communications, Inc. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API